Hi. We're Decker Communications.
We consult and train businesses in communications, in what they say and how they say it. We love what we do because our programs are transformational - we see more focus, confidence and effectiveness every day. We hope these posts will provide some insight on communications, increase your awareness and even boost your impact too.
  Learn more about us
Introducing our newest program!
Introducing our newest program!A hands-on experience to boost the stickiness of your ideas... and your impact.
  Learn more
  Register

Posts Tagged With: "speaking"

Warren Buffett knows about investing – in yourself

Kelly DeckerPosted by Kelly Decker   |   November 18th, 2009   |   1 Comment   |  Tweet This

When you see clips like these, it’s easy to understand why Warren Buffett is the man.

Now, of course, I LOVE the fact that he acknowledges communications as one of the #1 ways you can increase your human capital and value to your team, company, organization, and even family and friends, for that matter. (Of course, he should have  referenced Decker instead of the other guys.. Sorry, can’t help it.)

The best part though is that he’s a great model for effective communicating. He doesn’t just tell others to “do as I say, not as I do.” Here’s what he does well:

He’s incredibly likable. Guess what? You can be too! This is a skill that can be learned. He’s likable for three key reasons:

  • “Lightness of face” — Notice how he has the slightest of grins throughout the clip. He’s not foolishly smiling from ear to ear, just enough. This goes a long way for communications. Smiling is the simplest, although not always the easiest way to increase your likability to your listener. For example, you could be that grim-faced kind of person (not to say that you’re grim, just grim-faced) who processes and communicates information very seriously, maybe with a furrowed brow for extra concentration. That facial expression doesn’t do anything to help you connect and build rapport with your listener. We don’t buy long term from someone we don’t like – it would be too painful! So, next time go on and give smiling a try.
  • Conversational tone — It’s a town hall set up, so it should be that way. Not professorial, not a lecture – it feels like he’s just chatting with you.
  • He’s vulnerable — The great Warren Buffett also needed communication TRAINING! To be successful, you also have to have a constant eye on improvement. A forward lean toward progress. When’s the last time you invested in these skills? Communications training is often overlooked as a soft skill – but it’s critical to your success. Make it a new year’s resolution.

On the content side, he knows his audience. He uses a flurry of numbers to illustrate his point. Now mind you, this would NOT work in all circumstances, but this is to a group of Columbia business school students who squeal with delight at the thought of alpha, beta, and r-squared statistics.  These are human-scale stats to this particular breed. Human-scale statistics allows the listener to bring their experience to bear (learn more about this in Decker Made To Stick).

Warren Buffett gets it: invest in yourself and reap the return.


Categories: Communication Skills, Leadership and Communications, Public Speaking, Speakers
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment



Are you in the weeds?

Ben DeckerPosted by Ben Decker   |   November 5th, 2009   |   1 Comment   |  Tweet This

weeds4We’ve all been there – caught up in the shrinking world of tunnel vision.  But when communicating with others, being in the weeds can lose your audience.

Last week I coached two executives, neither of whom had used video feedback before.  In both of these sessions, we addressed the need to “get out of the weeds.”  Most often, when we’re in the weeds, we don’t realize it.  Having an outside perspective (such as coaching and video feedback) is important for this very reason.  When we are passionate and invested in a message, it’s our natural tendency to share as much as we can in as much detail as we can.  The material is so important, so brilliant and so valuable that we inadvertently create information overload in our fervor.

When you present your communications experience, are you in the weeds?  Consider these indicators:

  • The verbal content of your message is cluttered with verbosity, technical jargon, industry lingo, and too much detail.
  • The visuals presented are overkill (too many slides, too much text, little or no graphics).
  • Your presentation lacks stories, anecdotes, and humor.
  • Your intensity for the material blinds you from the need to connect with and engage your audience.

The answer?  Focus on two things and two things only.

  1. Your point of view:  What is the core message you want to convey?
  2. Your audience:  What’s in it for them?  What are they looking for in your message?  How can you focus on the aspects of your message that they’ll care about?

Simplify your material.  Divorce the details that excite you but alienate your listeners.  Become a master of exclusion and a facilitator of a memorable message.  Take “you” out of the message.  Focus on your listeners, learn them and create an experience that leaves an impact on them.

Want to connect your message with your audience?  Get out your weed whacker!

Photo credit: gracieshoots


Categories: Communication Skills, PowerPoint Abuse - Avoid It, SHARPs and Stories, Speakers, Video - Use It
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment



Does your message stick?

Ben DeckerPosted by Ben Decker   |   October 20th, 2009   |   1 Comment   |  Tweet This

I’m thrilled to introduce @MeredithGood, one of our newest team members brought on to do program development and marketing.  She’ll be contributing to the blog from now on, starting today!

In true Decker form, we videotaped the entire Decker Made To Stick Messaging debut program so we could (what else?) give ourselves feedback!  Several participants gave us feedback, too, so we can continuously improve and evolve.  With all this video lying around, @MeredithGood put together a short testimonial (for kicks!) to give you a sense of what Decker Made To Stick Messaging is all about.

What are you waiting for? Get in on the action and register for December 2nd! Hope to see you soon.


Categories: Communication Skills, Great Books, Leadership and Communications, Public Speaking, SHARPs and Stories, Video - Use It
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment



Feedback in Threes: Keepers, Improvements (& video)

Ben DeckerPosted by Ben Decker   |   October 14th, 2009   |   2 Comments   |  Tweet This

To criticize used to mean “to give counsel.” Now it too often means to tear down. In the age of instant communicating, we need to pause and think about what true “criticism” really means – feedback.

Without question, praise is the most powerful motivator. I was amazed at the profound meaning a few nice words (that I saw as no big deal) had for someone recently. Yesterday I got this email after I had thanked one of our people: “Wow, Ben. You’re welcome. Thanks for noticing! Means a lot that you said something.” Encouragement is powerful.

I must continually remind myself as I tend to look towards filling that half filled glass. So must we all.

We have a team of Program Leaders that lead various programs around the country and for them to lead an entire Decker Program takes months of training and extensive feedback.  That feedback can easily fall into “tweaks” or “constructive criticism.” It is a great reminder that there has to be encouragement with that.  Another of our Program Leaders reminded me she still has a note from me stating “Nice Job” on an initial program that she led…from 3 years ago!  I don’t remember doing it, but I’m glad I did.

We run into problems as speakers when we don’t take the time to solicit objective feedback. Although I now make my living from professional speaking, it wasn’t so long ago that I should have been paying people to listen to me (and even then might not have packed the house). I didn’t begin changing until I heard myself bumble through a speech on an audio playback. In just three minutes! Unbelievable. This prompted action.

I began seeking all kinds of feedback. There are three basic types, what we call the 3 x 3 Rule.

The 3 x 3 Rule: Pursue and obtain:

3 positive aspects of your presentation

3 areas where you could improve

You apply the 3 x 3 Rule via:

  1. People feedback – in every presentation, ask five people to provide feedback to you according to the the 3 x 3 Rule.
  2. Video-record every presentation you give (a quick and simple way to do this is with flip video cameras). When you see and hear it played back, write down your observations according to the 3 x 3 Rule.
  3. Audio-record yourself at every opportunity. When was the last time you listened to a voice mail of yourself? (In many cases, you can hit # to playback and approve it before sending.) Record conference calls and business/board presentations. You don’t have to listen to the whole thing – 10-30 seconds will give you a feel for the good, the bad, and the ugly.

If you multiply the 3 x 3 rule, you get more than 9. What you obtain is a foundation upon which you can build an action plan for excellence.


Categories: Communication Skills, Public Speaking, Video - Use It
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  2 Comments



All You Ever Wanted To Know About Speaking

Bert DeckerPosted by Bert Decker   |   June 10th, 2008   |   Leave a Comment   |  Tweet This

Audience
ALLTOP – a new way to quickly access the latest speaking tips.

Are you eager for a wide variety of advice on speaking and communicating. Now it’s available on one website – http://speaking.alltop.com/ – an aggregate just for speakers – and anyone who wants to get better. Or is just interested in speaking for that matter.

ALLTOP gathers all the speaking blogs you’ll ever want to visit (of course we thought this one was enough.) Guy Kawasaki is the creative genius behind ALLTOP, and you can find a lot of other interesting aggregations here too.


Categories: Communication Skills, Public Speaking, Short Bits
Tags: , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  Leave a Comment



Communication Wins Again

Bert DeckerPosted by Bert Decker   |   January 8th, 2008   |   6 Comments   |  Tweet This

President_primary
The Presidential Primaries are great cauldrons to see communications impact in action.
We can learn a lot, as the public platform emphasizes positives and negatives that relate to our everyday speaking. And NOW the newscasters are talking about the importance of likability and authenticity. It’s ALWAYS about likability and authenticity, for only then can your message get through to your audience. After just the first two primaries, we have the winners and losers, largely because of communications:

First, New Hampshire, because that race happened to be tonight:

Hillary Clinton: big winner. In the race and in her victory speech. She was finally vulnerable, and what some people call her "breakdown" when she ‘cried’ was actually a breakthrough. She did not cry (like Ed Muskie did in 1972 in the Presidential race where he lost the campaign with a display of weakness) nor did she display weakness. She was human and displayed emotion, and just in time to reach enough people to upset Barack Obama in the race. In her victory speech she used notes well, and spoke to the people. Her usual "I" centered message was touched with a new humility.

Barrack Obama: Always a great speaker (he was the #1 Best Communicator in my 2006 Annual List,) once again he hit a long ball, but not out of the park, with his ‘victory’ speech. Actually, he came in second in the election, but you wouldn’t know it from his speech. It was high energy, high confidence and high in rhetoric. He uses the ‘rule of three’ well. "Yes we can. Yes we can. Yes we can." (We’ll hear a lot more of that phrase in the days to come, and remember the rule of three.) And his speeches are very well written. And that’s actually why it wasn’t a home run, because if you were looking you could tell it was written, and read. He surprisingly uses a teleprompter, and does not use it well. That really surprises me, as it is pretty easy to learn how to use a teleprompter when you have to do so. Bill Clinton was a master at it. Look at Barrack’s eyes go to right, then left, then right, etc. Not natural, and it takes away from his power of voice and cadence by not going directly to ALL the audience with his eye contact.

John Edwards: A great speech. Edwards came in a distance third, and is unlikely as a candidate, but he gave a great speech, with wonderful stories and details of content. And by comparison, content was sorely missing in Obama’s speech, and pretty much in Clinton’s as well. Edwards also had a great line in saying that 99% of the country had not been heard from, and he was taking the message to the country.

Now read about the Republicans in New Hampshire and the Iowa winners and losers by clicking below:

Read the rest of this entry »


Categories: Leadership and Communications, Newsworthy, Political Communications, Speakers
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  6 Comments



The Presidential Debates and Senator Thompson

Bert DeckerPosted by Bert Decker   |   October 9th, 2007   |   1 Comment   |  Tweet This

Thompson_2The 2008 race for the Presidency started early, and so far the debates have not done too much. So many
candidates, so much clatter, so little distinction.

But today’s debate had something riding on it – would Senator Fred Thompson’s
late and highly anticipated entry in the race create a buzz and gain immediate support. So far – no. Typical of the early reaction is one high level comment that he "has no passion, no zeal and no apparent ‘want-to’…"

So today’s debate in Michigan is important to Thompson, if not so much the others. Did he do it – overcome the ennui that his campaign has mustered so far. Not by a long shot – and it’s both in his content and behavior. Look at the news clips and this clip and you’ll see him unsure in what he says, as if he DID retire a few years ago and was not yet back on top of it.

   

But the behavior is the tip-off for confidence and believability. Senator Thompson looks grim – just his face alone is reflective of pessimism not enthusiasm. That can work for the younger Thompson – the actor in "Law And Order" when he can be ‘crusty.’ But he’s older now, and needs to be a leader, not an actor. Even though he has Bill Clinton’s lip lick, he is tentative, and not inspiring.

Some say he is laconic, but he appeared uncomfortable, as shown by continuous head nodding and his tentative ‘ums’ and ‘ahs.’ He even lost his way. That was very surprising, as were the lack of focus, conviction and directness shown in his eyes darting about. Compare him in this clip with Mitt Romney – particularly with voice and eyes.

There is a long way to go in this race, but I’ll predict that the ultimate winner won’t be Senator Thompson – since communications is such a key part of leadership.

And based on communications, the handicappers would have to favor the one who got the biggest laugh, smooth Mitt Romney, (though he would be a bit better off if he messed his hair up now and then.) Mayor Rudy Guilani is convicting, but perhaps there’s a dark horse in Governor Mike Huckabee.


Categories: Newsworthy, Political Communications, Speakers
Tags: , , , ,

Tweet This  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment