Where’s the Vision? – The Second Presidential Debate

First thoughts – they both came to play. President Obama and Governor Romney were contentious, confrontive, strong, and articulate. If you favored one guy, he won.

But the audience lost.

 

 

Messaging

So many conflicting stories. Even the fact checkers are conflicted. I guess the best offense is a good defense. So we won’t talk specific issues here, but behavior, because as usual, Behavior Reigns.

Rising above the issues and arguments – there were so many opportunities to cast a vision. To lift the audience up. Neither candidate took the opportunity. In our communications coaching we always urge our clients to think BENEFITS – what’s in it for the listener. Both Obama and Romney kept it all about THEM. In different ways…

 

Obama

He recovered from the first debate. More energy, combative and interruptive where appropriate. (And maybe where not appropriate for a President.)

On the positives, several times he had rhetorical flourishes that were typical in his 2008 campaign. He moved around well, had good eye contact with Moderator Candy Crowley. And he reviewed the VP Debate split screen when sitting and listening as he did not pull a “Biden” by smirking and eye rolling when Romney was speaking (though there were a couple of ‘slow blinks.’)

On the negative side, his cadence often gets in the way of believability. Too often we feel it is a ‘speech’ rather than the authentic thoughts and feelings of a man – our President. And when you add to that the tilt of his serious face – those who dislike him would say arrogance – we don’t feel the likability that the polls show.

 

Romney

He continued his behavioral performance from the first debate – confident and assured in manner and voice.

On the positives, he often used the ‘rule of three,’ and had a great command of facts and figures. He often said “We don’t have to settle for this” and “We don’t have to live like this.” Romney again held himself like a CEO, and the Town Hall format gave him a chance to ‘stride’ without being stiff and jerky, as he often is. Many said he wouldn’t relate in the Town Hall setting, but he did just fine with that, as did Obama.

On the negative side, Romney asked direct questions of Obama rather than making statements AT Obama. When we rehearse executives in Q&A, we advise ending on a positive statement of your Point Of View, rather than an open ended question at an adversary. This happened several times, and Romney looked defensive as Obama parried him – and particularly rattled with the Benghazi question at the end, where Romney lost a big opportunity to make an important point. (I expect we’ll hear more on this in the days to come.)

 

So what…

No clear winner here, and the beat goes on. This will be a tight race to the wire, with only a sliver of folks undecided. There will be two factors that will sway those undecided:

  1. Who they believe – so much mud slinging and accusations of lying on both sides make trust and believability a tough issue. And behavior and likability will go a long way in determining that.
  2. A mis-step – if either Obama or Romney is caught in a real untruth or situation that rises above the cacophony of charges and countercharges, that could trump behavior.

 

So next weeks debate could be telling – we’ll see.

The Five Biggest Mistakes CEOs Make in Speaking

Most CEOs are not inspiring. After years of working with leaders in business, it’s hard to come to any other conclusion. And of all the people who have to lead and motivate, they’re it! Leaders clearly rose in the ranks for a reason, but by the time they get to C-level, most have never received the right coaching to present their ideas brilliantly. It’s hard by that point to get a training session where you can take risks and grow in your communication without a bunch of handlers and support people around. But it’s worth the effort, as those focused on getting the right training know – look at Steve Jobs, Chuck Schwab, and Bill Clinton for a few examples.

Here’s a countdown of presenting tips for the top dog (and all the underdogs, too). Speaking and communicating is a learned skill, critical for leadership and motivation – the CEOs primary task.

Mistake #5 – CEOs Read Speeches

In short:

In depth:

Surprisingly, this is still happening. Here’s the thing – reading just doesn’t work. People tend to think that speaking is just a form of the written medium. Nope – they are almost polar opposites in form and purpose.

CEOs probably lean towards reading speeches for a few reasons. 1) So someone else can write the speech, 2) So they don’t have to practice, or 3) Maybe they insist on being precisely accurate in the exact words they say. The problem is it’s not effective. We are all taught that if we say the right words people will get the message, but it’s not true. Not when you behavior doesn’t match your message. When reading, you usually:

  • Look down too much to read and keep up with the content, only glancing up at the audience. There’s no way to really connect with your listeners with good eye communication if you’re not maintaining it for more than a second at a time.
  • Ping pong back and forth to the podiums, if you’re using teleprompters.
  • Become more monotone because you are READING not speaking and expressing from the heart.
  • Get stuck behind a lectern, often holding on for dear life (if you fear public speaking), instead of moving around naturally and gesturing with enthusiasm.

Reading speeches can be perceived as inauthentic by the audience because it’s clear someone else wrote the speech for you.

Don’t read speeches! It may be easier and feel safer, but it does not communicate well, much less inspire or motivate. And it takes twice as long to prepare. So if you’re not going to write the whole thing out, or bullet all your points, how do you prepare? I’m biased, but highly recommend the Decker Grid. It’s an easy, structured, organized methodology that allows you to put together a presentation quickly, and you’ll never have to read a speech again.

Mistake #4 – CEOs Don’t Tell Stories

In short:

  • Get away from informing with facts, figures, and data, and start influencing.
  • Cast a vision for your organization to motivate.
  • Highlight common aspirations, efforts, and triumphs for memorability.

In depth:

Before email, before blogging, even before the Guttenberg Press, there were speeches. And those speeches had STORIES. They communicated with power and emotion.

CEOs, much like all of us, get continuously inundated with facts and figures. They are pressured with the minutiae of the day, so they tend to think in facts, tasks, concepts, numbers, etc. The problem is, in the spoken medium facts and figures don’t stick. They are not remembered, and they are usually boring. People may need to know the numbers, but save them for the written medium and send out a document when you are trying to inform, not trying to influence.

Ironically, the CEOs real job is not to inform, but to influence. Leaders are the vision casters (or should be). Vision is made up of the collective aspirations, efforts, and triumphs of the organization. Guess what’s overflowingly vital, interesting, and compelling? Stories.

Plus, stories are easy to remember and tell. They make public speaking easier. I remember a newly elected CEO who happened to be at the headquarters about a month before he was to officially start, and there was an all-employee meeting going on. The interim leader asked if he wanted to drop by, and the CEO saw an opportunity – not for a formal address but to say a few words – just to get acquainted. He thought quickly. Spoke for 8 minutes, 6 of which were a story about his first experience with the company. People loved it, and him. A story is not only easy to tell, it connects with people. Sometimes that’s the most important thing.

So become a storyteller. It’s not just for CEOs, but for all of us. They are great conversation starters at lunches, conferences, and even parties. Stories are going on all around us – and we don’t take advantage of them. Use your own personal stories, and also tap in to stories of your employees and clients. You can make a point about someone else by lauding, building up, or highlighting them, rather than yourself. Keep your ears and eyes open for potential stories happening around you.

Mistake #3 – CEOs Are Too Stiff

In short:

  • Loosen up and show energy.
  • Step away from the lectern and use the stage or meeting room space, let big gestures happen, and smile once in a while.

In depth:

Way too often we have seen a CEO making a major speech, with both hands hanging on the lectern for dear life. Not good. First of all, why is the CEO hanging on? He or she is the CEO and should not be nervous anyway, so why isn’t he or she showing energy, enthusiasm, and excitement about the message?

One of the primary problems I see in most leaders is they are too stiff, too mechanical. Communication and influence rides energy, and too many people lose all their natural and expressive energy when it counts most – when they are leveraging their time speaking to hundreds or thousands at once. They emphasize their content, thinking “if I just say the right words, people will get it.” Nope.

When you give an inconsistent message, people will trust and believe what they see and hear, not so much what you say. At the very least, you need to move, gesture, and smile.

What do you do, exactly?

  • Forward lean, like an athlete. If CEO thought more like athletes, they would habitually be in the ready position – on the balls of your feet, ready to move. If you’re forward, you want to MOVE forward, both physically and psychologically. Then you can get out from behind the lectern and move around the stage or room. Naturally. Not standing stiff and wooden in one place.
  • Let your hands work for you. In personally coaching thousands of leaders, I’ve seen maybe a handful who over use their hands and gestures. The problem is we all tend to have a nervous gesture that we are comfortable with, like fiddling with a wedding ring, that shows our nervousness. Don’t let your comfort be your guide, help the audience be comfortable with you be showing confidence and certainty in your gestures.
  • Lighten up. Your audience is drawn to passion. Smile makes you approachable. Just try adding some lightness next time.

Mistake #2 – CEOs Are Not Always Creating

In short:

  • Conduct your own brainstorming instead of relying on everyone else’s pitch, perspective, push.
  • Resist the temptation to let someone else draft your presentation. It won’t sound like you, and you won’t feel the enthusiasm that you need to exude to your audience.
  • Cut down on bureaucracy where you can – if there’s nothing coming out of this formal, scheduled meeting, then why have it?

In depth:

We’re all too busy. CEOs are way too busy, but that’s life, and no excuse to not accomplish one of their primary functions – creating a vision, a culture, and fostering a climate of creativity in their companies and organizations. The lesson applies to all of us. There are a few main problems we’re dealing with here:

Problem #1

CEOs are caught in the traditional academic, analytical, linear way of thinking. Facts and figures, financial pressures, decisions and tasks, people clamoring for decisions.

Solution

Expand your thought process beyond your comfort zone. Conduct personal brainstorming on problems – and even more so on the blank slate of possibilities. Unfortunately we are rarely taught true brainstorming in school, and there isn’t enough in business.

Here are the three rules of brainstorming:

  • Quantity, not quality – get it all down instead of judging your ideas
  • Set a time limit of 3 to 5 minutes to force the mind to create fast
  • No pre-editing in the moment – let one idea trigger another

It is amazing what you can come up with in a short period of time, and there are ideas that you never would have thought of if you had stifled the creative process. Brainstorming also prevents writer’s and messaging block. Using Post-its when brainstorming is a cornerstone of the Decker Grid Systemin creating speeches, presentations, and messages because you can easily move them around. Mind Mapping is another creative technique, which is most useful in taking notes.

Problem #2

CEOs have other people create their speeches. Not good, although it is fine to have other people give feedback, do additional research, and augment the CEOs original ideas. The key point here is the CEO (and all of us) must originate our key points out of our passion if we want to be authentic and effective.

Solution

Always create your own messages, use your own ideas. Be on the alert for SHARPs. Jot down ideas continuously. Keep a notebook.

Problem #3

The larger the organization, the more bureaucratic the mindset. That environment can be stifling for new ideas. And too many CEOs are leading the bureaucracy, protected by underlings from the energetic hubbub of where the business (and vitality) is really happening.

Solution

Lead the creative charge. Motivate others to continuously create.

  • Cut down on unnecessary meetings
  • Advocate brainstorming in regular meetings
  • Have unconventional offsite meetings
  • Create a culture where your team questions, “Is this the best we can do?”
  • Model creativity, not bureaucracy

It’s not easy being busy, but it’s just as easy being creatively busy as being boringly busy. Plus it’s more successful, and more fun!

Mistake #1 – CEOs Are Not Always Communicating Vision

In short:

  • Synthesize your vision to a sentence or two so it’s easy to remember.
  • Make sure to have contact with clients and customers, employees from the top to the bottom, to stay in touch with all facets of the organization.

In depth:

Communicate vision, all the time, relentlessly.

The #1 job of any leader is to continuously communicate vision, mission, goal, and purpose of the organization. This seems obvious, but there are reasons why too many CEOs make this mistake.

They get insulated. In Mistake #2, we talked about the bureaucratic mindset stifling creativity. That same atmosphere, along with layers of people between the executive and the customer, can satisfy the visionary mind of the executive if you doesn’t actively work against it. The best CEOs live and breathe their vision. They ARE the vision.

Jim Collins wrote two books that emphasized this. In Good to Great, he wrote about the Level 5 Leader who might not have been charismatic in the traditional sense, but was passionate about the vision of the company. In his first book Built To Last, Collins drove home the point that companies without vision simply don’t last. Just as people without vision do not accomplish much.

Too many CEOs think the formal one page Vision Statement that every employee may have to memorize takes care of the whole vision thing. It doesn’t.

What do you do about all this?

Shorten the vision to a sentence. Two at the most. The essence of a company or organization.

Examples:

  • Starbucks: “Starbucks will be the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world while maintaining our uncompromising principles while we grow.”
  • Henry Ford: “We will build a motor car for the great multitude.”
  • Pixar Animation: “To tell stories. To make real films. To make the world’s first completely animated feature film.”

Lead by walking around. Get out there. Although Tom Peters saw “managing by wandering around” as the basis of leadership and excellence, and called it the “technology of the obvious,” very few CEOs actually do it. What better way to communicate vision than to walk around – have lunch in the company cafeteria, walk the halls, be seen on the floor.

And think of all the time we spend on the phone – use it creatively. Keep your vision top of mind and you’ll be surprised how many opportunities there are to mention it. And remember that the phone can convey emotion, enthusiasm, energy, excitement far better than an email.

Big visions are great, but even a small vision is better than none – whether it’s customer or employee based, benefit or feature based, micro or macro based, local or national based, price or quality based, etc.

To Wrap This All Up

Ask most people in business and they will not know the vision of their company. Ask most CEOs and too often there will not be a precise, distinctive one-sentence answer. And there IS always a vision – it just needs to be thought through, honed down, and articulated.

Bonus: Here are some classic vision castings to stimulate YOUR vision casting – for after all, we all are CEOs of something or someone, if even ourselves:

To start off, one of the great vision casters was Theodore Roosevelt who said this on national greatness: “Like all Americans, I like big things; big prairies, big forests and mountains, big wheat-fields, railroads, — and herds of cattle, too, — big factories, steamboats, and everything else.”

Thomas John Watson, Sr. was the founder of IBM and he said, “The great accomplishments of man have resulted from the transmission of ideas of enthusiasm.”

“If we are to survive, we must have ideas, vision, and courage. These things are rarely produced by committees. Everything that matters in our intellectual and moral life begins with an individual confronting his own mind and conscience in a room by himself.” -Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.

“A vision is not a vision unless it says yes to some ideas and no to others, inspires people and is a reason to get out of bed in the morning and come to work.” -Gifford Pinchot

“The very essence of leadership is that you have to have vision. You can’t blow an uncertain trumpet.” -Theodore Hesburgh

“The mind is the limit. As long as the mind can envision the fact that you can do something, you can do it – as long as you really believe 100 percent.” -Arnold Schwarzenegger

“People ask the difference between a leader and a boss. The leader leads, and the boss drives.” -Theodore Roosevelt

“I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth.” -John F. Kennedy

Warren Buffett knows about investing – in yourself

When you see clips like these, it’s easy to understand why Warren Buffett is the man.

Now, of course, I LOVE the fact that he acknowledges communications as one of the #1 ways you can increase your human capital and value to your team, company, organization, and even family and friends, for that matter. (Of course, he should have  referenced Decker instead of the other guys.. Sorry, can’t help it.)

The best part though is that he’s a great model for effective communicating. He doesn’t just tell others to “do as I say, not as I do.” Here’s what he does well:

He’s incredibly likable. Guess what? You can be too! This is a skill that can be learned. He’s likable for three key reasons:

  • “Lightness of face” — Notice how he has the slightest of grins throughout the clip. He’s not foolishly smiling from ear to ear, just enough. This goes a long way for communications. Smiling is the simplest, although not always the easiest way to increase your likability to your listener. For example, you could be that grim-faced kind of person (not to say that you’re grim, just grim-faced) who processes and communicates information very seriously, maybe with a furrowed brow for extra concentration. That facial expression doesn’t do anything to help you connect and build rapport with your listener. We don’t buy long term from someone we don’t like – it would be too painful! So, next time go on and give smiling a try.
  • Conversational tone — It’s a town hall set up, so it should be that way. Not professorial, not a lecture – it feels like he’s just chatting with you.
  • He’s vulnerable — The great Warren Buffett also needed communication TRAINING! To be successful, you also have to have a constant eye on improvement. A forward lean toward progress. When’s the last time you invested in these skills? Communications training is often overlooked as a soft skill – but it’s critical to your success. Make it a new year’s resolution.

On the content side, he knows his audience. He uses a flurry of numbers to illustrate his point. Now mind you, this would NOT work in all circumstances, but this is to a group of Columbia business school students who squeal with delight at the thought of alpha, beta, and r-squared statistics.  These are human-scale stats to this particular breed. Human-scale statistics allows the listener to bring their experience to bear (learn more about this in Decker Made To Stick).

Warren Buffett gets it: invest in yourself and reap the return.

Are you in the weeds?

weeds4We’ve all been there – caught up in the shrinking world of tunnel vision.  But when communicating with others, being in the weeds can lose your audience.

Last week I coached two executives, neither of whom had used video feedback before.  In both of these sessions, we addressed the need to “get out of the weeds.”  Most often, when we’re in the weeds, we don’t realize it.  Having an outside perspective (such as coaching and video feedback) is important for this very reason.  When we are passionate and invested in a message, it’s our natural tendency to share as much as we can in as much detail as we can.  The material is so important, so brilliant and so valuable that we inadvertently create information overload in our fervor.

When you present your communications experience, are you in the weeds?  Consider these indicators:

  • The verbal content of your message is cluttered with verbosity, technical jargon, industry lingo, and too much detail.
  • The visuals presented are overkill (too many slides, too much text, little or no graphics).
  • Your presentation lacks stories, anecdotes, and humor.
  • Your intensity for the material blinds you from the need to connect with and engage your audience.

The answer?  Focus on two things and two things only.

  1. Your point of view:  What is the core message you want to convey?
  2. Your audience:  What’s in it for them?  What are they looking for in your message?  How can you focus on the aspects of your message that they’ll care about?

Simplify your material.  Divorce the details that excite you but alienate your listeners.  Become a master of exclusion and a facilitator of a memorable message.  Take “you” out of the message.  Focus on your listeners, learn them and create an experience that leaves an impact on them.

Want to connect your message with your audience?  Get out your weed whacker!

Photo credit: gracieshoots

Does your message stick?

I’m thrilled to introduce @MeredithGood, one of our newest team members brought on to do program development and marketing.  She’ll be contributing to the blog from now on, starting today!

In true Decker form, we videotaped the entire Decker Made To Stick Messaging debut program so we could (what else?) give ourselves feedback!  Several participants gave us feedback, too, so we can continuously improve and evolve.  With all this video lying around, @MeredithGood put together a short testimonial (for kicks!) to give you a sense of what Decker Made To Stick Messaging is all about.

What are you waiting for? Get in on the action and register for December 2nd! Hope to see you soon.

Feedback in Threes: Keepers, Improvements (& video)

To criticize used to mean “to give counsel.” Now it too often means to tear down. In the age of instant communicating, we need to pause and think about what true “criticism” really means – feedback.

Without question, praise is the most powerful motivator. I was amazed at the profound meaning a few nice words (that I saw as no big deal) had for someone recently. Yesterday I got this email after I had thanked one of our people: “Wow, Ben. You’re welcome. Thanks for noticing! Means a lot that you said something.” Encouragement is powerful.

I must continually remind myself as I tend to look towards filling that half filled glass. So must we all.

We have a team of Program Leaders that lead various programs around the country and for them to lead an entire Decker Program takes months of training and extensive feedback.  That feedback can easily fall into “tweaks” or “constructive criticism.” It is a great reminder that there has to be encouragement with that.  Another of our Program Leaders reminded me she still has a note from me stating “Nice Job” on an initial program that she led…from 3 years ago!  I don’t remember doing it, but I’m glad I did.

We run into problems as speakers when we don’t take the time to solicit objective feedback. Although I now make my living from professional speaking, it wasn’t so long ago that I should have been paying people to listen to me (and even then might not have packed the house). I didn’t begin changing until I heard myself bumble through a speech on an audio playback. In just three minutes! Unbelievable. This prompted action.

I began seeking all kinds of feedback. There are three basic types, what we call the 3 x 3 Rule.

The 3 x 3 Rule: Pursue and obtain:

3 positive aspects of your presentation

3 areas where you could improve

You apply the 3 x 3 Rule via:

  1. People feedback – in every presentation, ask five people to provide feedback to you according to the the 3 x 3 Rule.
  2. Video-record every presentation you give (a quick and simple way to do this is with flip video cameras). When you see and hear it played back, write down your observations according to the 3 x 3 Rule.
  3. Audio-record yourself at every opportunity. When was the last time you listened to a voice mail of yourself? (In many cases, you can hit # to playback and approve it before sending.) Record conference calls and business/board presentations. You don’t have to listen to the whole thing – 10-30 seconds will give you a feel for the good, the bad, and the ugly.

If you multiply the 3 x 3 rule, you get more than 9. What you obtain is a foundation upon which you can build an action plan for excellence.

All You Ever Wanted To Know About Speaking

ALLTOP – a new way to quickly access the latest speaking tips.

Are you eager for a wide variety of advice on speaking and communicating. Now it’s available on one website – http://speaking.alltop.com/ – an aggregate just for speakers – and anyone who wants to get better. Or is just interested in speaking for that matter.

ALLTOP gathers all the speaking blogs you’ll ever want to visit (of course we thought this one was enough.) Guy Kawasaki is the creative genius behind ALLTOP, and you can find a lot of other interesting aggregations here too.

Communication Wins Again

The Presidential Primaries are great cauldrons to see communications impact in action. We can learn a lot, as the public platform emphasizes positives and negatives that relate to our everyday speaking. And NOW the newscasters are talking about the importance of likability and authenticity. It’s ALWAYS about likability and authenticity, for only then can your message get through to your audience. After just the first two primaries, we have the winners and losers, largely because of communications:

First, New Hampshire, because that race happened to be tonight:

Hillary Clinton: big winner. In the race and in her victory speech. She was finally vulnerable, and what some people call her “breakdown” when she ‘cried’ was actually a breakthrough. She did not cry (like Ed Muskie did in 1972 in the Presidential race where he lost the campaign with a display of weakness) nor did she display weakness. She was human and displayed emotion, and just in time to reach enough people to upset Barack Obama in the race. In her victory speech she used notes well, and spoke to the people. Her usual “I” centered message was touched with a new humility.

Barrack Obama: Always a great speaker (he was the #1 Best Communicator in my 2006 Annual List,) once again he hit a long ball, but not out of the park, with his ‘victory’ speech. Actually, he came in second in the election, but you wouldn’t know it from his speech. It was high energy, high confidence and high in rhetoric. He uses the ‘rule of three’ well. “Yes we can. Yes we can. Yes we can.” (We’ll hear a lot more of that phrase in the days to come, and remember the rule of three.) And his speeches are very well written. And that’s actually why it wasn’t a home run, because if you were looking you could tell it was written, and read. He surprisingly uses a teleprompter, and does not use it well. That really surprises me, as it is pretty easy to learn how to use a teleprompter when you have to do so. Bill Clinton was a master at it. Look at Barrack’s eyes go to right, then left, then right, etc. Not natural, and it takes away from his power of voice and cadence by not going directly to ALL the audience with his eye contact.

John Edwards: A great speech. Edwards came in a distance third, and is unlikely as a candidate, but he gave a great speech, with wonderful stories and details of content. And by comparison, content was sorely missing in Obama’s speech, and pretty much in Clinton’s as well. Edwards also had a great line in saying that 99% of the country had not been heard from, and he was taking the message to the country.

Now read about the Republicans in New Hampshire and the Iowa winners and losers by clicking below:

Continue reading

The Presidential Debates and Senator Thompson

The 2008 race for the Presidency started early, and so far the debates have not done too much. So many candidates, so much clatter, so little distinction.

But today’s debate had something riding on it – would Senator Fred Thompson’s
late and highly anticipated entry in the race create a buzz and gain immediate support. So far – no. Typical of the early reaction is one high level comment that he “has no passion, no zeal and no apparent ‘want-to’…”

So today’s debate in Michigan is important to Thompson, if not so much the others. Did he do it – overcome the ennui that his campaign has mustered so far. Not by a long shot – and it’s both in his content and behavior. Look at the news clips and this clip and you’ll see him unsure in what he says, as if he DID retire a few years ago and was not yet back on top of it.

   

But the behavior is the tip-off for confidence and believability. Senator Thompson looks grim – just his face alone is reflective of pessimism not enthusiasm. That can work for the younger Thompson – the actor in “Law And Order” when he can be ‘crusty.’ But he’s older now, and needs to be a leader, not an actor. Even though he has Bill Clinton’s lip lick, he is tentative, and not inspiring.

Some say he is laconic, but he appeared uncomfortable, as shown by continuous head nodding and his tentative ‘ums’ and ‘ahs.’ He even lost his way. That was very surprising, as were the lack of focus, conviction and directness shown in his eyes darting about. Compare him in this clip with Mitt Romney – particularly with voice and eyes.

There is a long way to go in this race, but I’ll predict that the ultimate winner won’t be Senator Thompson – since communications is such a key part of leadership.

And based on communications, the handicappers would have to favor the one who got the biggest laugh, smooth Mitt Romney, (though he would be a bit better off if he messed his hair up now and then.) Mayor Rudy Guilani is convicting, but perhaps there’s a dark horse in Governor Mike Huckabee.

100% Success Rate

In my speeches and programs I’m often encouraging people to volunteer – to risk. To speak up for example. You probably often find yourself in the same situation – exhorting the recalcitrant to take a risk.

The 95% Solution

Both psychologists Abraham Maslow and Karen Horney did extensive work on the development of self esteem and self actualization. In her book on human growth Horney in particularly found that when people made the attempt to do something scary and risky – they most often succeeded. In doing my own research with myself and others, I find that the success rate is about 90% to 95% – we do well when we make the attempt.

“Concern should drive us into action and not into depression.”
Karen Horney

The 100% Solution

Think of this – if we learn something in that 5% of the time that we don’t do it so well, that makes the ‘failure’ a very large success. So it follows that WHENEVER we attempt something – and LEARN from our mistakes – we will succeed. So whenever we take that risk and volunteer we succeed 100% of the time.

But if we don’t attempt something, we always fail. We lose the opportunity, and regret our weakness, and that moment can’t be recaptured.

So play the odds. Take every opportunity to volunteer, to risk, to speak, to venture forth. Every time you do so you will succeed, and every time you do NOT risk – that you shrink up and get small – you will fail. Encourage your audiences of one or one thousand with “What’s to lose by risking!”